Corporate Skills for Church Leaders

June 29, 2007 by
Filed under: Religion 

Since getting re-involved in the church, I’m often frustrated at the general pace and tenor of church work.  (This is particularly true in our national conflicts, but I’m thinking primarily of local issues here.)  Everything is done VERY slowly, and there are far too many unnecessary interpersonal conflicts (conflict being a broad term encompassing everything from annoyance to lack of communication).  In the corporate world, the company would have been restructured and had its culture adjusted long ago.

It’s not even the case that the issues stem from differences between Christian values and capitalist corporate values.  Most of church disagreements are quite similar to corporate disagreements:  resistance to change, people having to have their input on a change, people just generally behaving badly, etc.

Some examples:  I’ve been involved in committee meetings where one person is allowed to dominate the discussion and consume all available time.  I’ve been involved in groups that forget important people (stakeholders) and push ahead with the obvious “right thing to do” without recognizing the opposition that is waiting.  We’ve all heard from a pew-sitter or even officer or leader who is upset that they were left out of a decision that “obviously” should have included them.  These aren’t even examples of malicious interference – that is even worse.

So here is my proposal – ALL church officers (deacons, elders, trustees, and clergy) and other leaders (non-ordained staff, committee leaders, etc) should have training in the following areas:

  1. Communications
  2. Conflict Management
  3. Project Management
  4. Change Management

When it comes to officers, the training need only be done once per term (or once per person letting the officer determine whether or not they need the training again).  For committee chairs and staff members, it should be done once per person.

Communications
A typical corporate Communications class consists of training in the following areas:   communications goals,  communications styles, bridging communications between people of different styles, roles and responsibilities within communications,  active listening, non-verbal skills, openness, cultural issues, and rudimentary conflict skills.  In the corporate world this tends to be a 3-day 8-hour per day class.
Where Sexual Vitality Comes From Legend has it that an ancient Chinese goatherder noticed his goats got sexually active after grazing on weeds including horny goat weed (Epimedium Sagittatum) is a hardy perennial cheap tadalafil pills reported to have aphrodisiac qualities. Erectile dysfunction treatment should be started as early as cialis tadalafil 50mg possible. The models are taught in three steps to tadalafil professional all managers. 1. Erectile dysfunction usually occurs in men as they age and it’s important pharmacy shop link cipla levitra to get I checked out as in many cases multiple, some of which are easily manageable medical conditions.
Conflict Management
A typical corporate Conflict Management class consists of training in the following areas:  defining conflict, underlying causes, stages of conflict, conflict in teams, diffusing anger (and passive aggressive behavior), opening dialogue, conflict resolution (including compromise), and establishing a collaborative environment.  In the corporate world this tends to be a 2-3 day 8-hour per day class.

Project Management
A typical corporate Project Management class consists of training in the following areas:  stages of a project,  objectives, goals, requirements, deliverables, estimating, managing workload and resources, scheduling, evaluating risk, control of the project as it progresses, managing progress, project completion and closure, and rudimentary change management skills.  In the corporate world this tends to be a 4 day 8-hour per day class.

Change Management
A typical corporate Change Management class consists of training in the following areas:  determining the need for change, identifying and involving stakeholders, intellectual and emotional reactions to change, overcoming resistance to change, moving from fear to commitment to change, the importance of a change champion and leadership support for change, the importance of communications during change, change completion, recovery and rebounding.  In the corporate world this tends to be a 2 day 8-hour per day class.

Let me be clear – I’m NOT advocating that each officer be run thorough 12 days (and about $12,000) of training.  Most congregations already have people with corporate skills and many will have an actual trainer sitting in the pews.  I believe that officers and leaders need the rudiments of each of these skills.  These classes could probably be boiled down to a total of 8 hours of classroom and activity time, with external resources (your local church camp or conference center?) providing more depth on an as-needed.  I would assume (but I’m prepared to be told that I’m wrong) that clergy would receive training in these areas in seminary.

As Christians, we are expected to be in community and harmony (overall) with each other and therefore the willingness to improve our skills for working with each other and for God should already be there.  We just need to formalize the process of gaining those skills and doing our work more effectively.  And then let’s use the extra time and energy (no longer wasted) for prayer, time with God, or even more good works.

What do you think?

Disclaimer:  I have no relationship with Learning Tree or the American Management Association other than having taken their classes in the past.  Other trainers will provide the same training of comparable value.

Comments

5 Comments on Corporate Skills for Church Leaders

  1. pligg.com on Fri, 29th Jun 2007 2:41 pm
  2. Mark Time: Corporate Skills for Church Leaders

    A recommendation that church leaders receive training in communication, conflict, project and change management skills similar to what the corporate world receives.

  3. Quotidian Grace on Fri, 29th Jun 2007 8:54 pm
  4. You make your case very well, and basically I agree with you.

    But…I’ve run into enough churches that don’t even train their elders/deacons in the basics of Presbyterian beliefs and polity to despair of expecting the pastors who usually run the new officer training including conflict management and other corporate skills as well.

    I don’t think pastors get training in these areas in seminary, but I’m not a pastor so I stand to be corrected. There are a lot of workshops and seminars on these subjects offered to pastors, though, that can fill this need.

    Of course many congregations have a lot of officers who are already trained in these skills in their workplace as you say. It helps if they are encouraged to use them as they exercise their responsibilities in the congregation as well.

  5. Adam on Sun, 1st Jul 2007 1:56 pm
  6. I LOVE it, Mark. It’s been my experience that training is a very small part of session meetings, whether it’s on doctrine, communication skills, or anything else. What I love about your idea more than anything is the fact that you are opening up the possibility that people, trained in the corporate world, might start to learn what skills and value they bring to a congregation. The previous comment is right – pastors AREN’T trained in these sorts of things – nor really, should they be. The model that pastors are responsible for leading in every conceivable discipline only kills pastors and leads to average, lukewarm congregations.

  7. Mark on Mon, 2nd Jul 2007 1:56 pm
  8. Thanks to you both.

    Adam – a lot of what I list as corporate training is fairly universal. Communications and conflict management classes aren’t linked to a specialty – this is something that any corporate professional should know. I WOULD expect pastors to know how to work with people singly and in groups.

    I’ll give you that project management and change management are a bit more esoteric. However – isn’t the process of accepting Christ and changing to be more Christ-like essentially a change management process? You’ve got all of the classic reactions: denial, passive/aggressive, accepting, enthusiasm (and overenthusiasm), etc. And that doesn’t even address changes in congregations.

    I’m not suggesting that church leaders should be experts in all areas, but a least a basic training would be very useful.

  9. Douglasah on Mon, 9th Jul 2007 10:28 pm
  10. This is an old problem. The catching point(s) still are: People who don’t want to change, people who don’t see that there is a problem, people who don’t want to “Go to hell” so a change can be made, peole who don’t want to listen, and people who seriously believe that everyone already knows how they feel, and why, to name only a few. Another problem is that many of our communication “Goals” aren’t “Goals” in the sense that they are not results, they’re directions. While corporate-style communications are useful in getting meetings over with, they still have a result, not discernment as they’re final purpose. Are things slow? yes. Is it maddening? yes. Is it efficient? no. Has something meaningful for millions of people over the last 2000 years or so come out of it? YES!

Tell me what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!