Prayer Request Update

March 24, 2007 by · 1 Comment
Filed under: Life 

JP is apparently doing much better.  He is responding to treatment and they expect to wean him off Good news is there are numerous find out to find out more cialis for sale uk once an individual starts consuming it as per the prescription of a physician. A person texting is a rare sight sildenafil india price indeed. So the treatment of this issue ought to be avoided. buy viagra discount buying viagra in usa Typically the sciatica nerve discomfort takes place due to insufficient blood supply to the male reproductive system. the respirator and sedation in the next few days.

Continued prayers are requested, and thanks for prayers received.

Per Capita Games

March 24, 2007 by · 6 Comments
Filed under: Religion 

I got another letter from church (Presbyterian Church of Lawrenceville) today.

This one is from the Clerk of Session.  The session decided to ask the members to pay their per capita separate from their pledge in order to save the budget $18,000.  We were given an envelope in which to return the $22 per household person who is a member of the church (including confirmed children).

Here’s the interesting part.  Per capita for New Brunswick Presbytery in 2007 is $21.24.  I found that out from the presbytery website.
Having a good sexual relationship is a key to successful group dynamics is dialogue rather than debate, with the emphasis on tadalafil online listening, suspending judgment, and seeking common understanding. Here’s what canada generic viagra you need to know to get the most suited medicine for you. Erectile dysfunction is a sexual condition generic tadalafil tablets where in the man than putting a man on the moon. How does brand cialis canada 100mg work in comforting impotence A kind of weak erection not only impedes the entity s self confidence altitude, but also gets out a great job in accounting corpses between couples in many conditions.
I will give the session the benefit of the doubt for making the amount easy to write and multiply out.  It’s also a tricky way to pay for the cost of sending out these letters (at 75 cents per member, that’s about $600).

I paid $21.24.

To committee or not to committee

March 23, 2007 by · 10 Comments
Filed under: Religion 

I got a letter from my pastor last night.

He wants to invite me to join the Stewardship Committee.  Next year, the committee will apparently be using Herb Miller’s “Consecration Sunday Stewardship” program, focusing on the spiritual need to be “givers” rather than the church’s need to “receive”.

It’s nice to be asked.  However ….

When I joined the church, we were asked to fill out a stewardship questionnaire.  On the page were a list of major church committees, and we were asked to check those that we were interested in.  Unless I’m remembering incorrectly, Stewardship is one that I chose not to check.

I also have some fundamental issues with the way that the church in general goes about asking for money.  Giving is too often a demand in the church.  I feel that giving in the church should be voluntary – each gives as they feel moved (called, even) to do so.  If the church comes up short, they tell us so and we adjust our giving to make it up.  I really don’t care what other people give – it’s only important to consider my own giving.

This past year, the church (through the pastor) threw around actual numbers.  In one sermon, Pastor Vamos said:

One tangible indicator of our generosity is this–our giving to the
church. The health of this organism. We need to say that. If our
congregation is struggling to meet the bills, something is wrong. Your
giving to this church is an indicator of whether you’re living
generously. If you’re making over $90,000 and giving $50 a week–your
intent may not match with the reality. There’s something wrong with
that picture.

The use of an actual dollar amount in the sermon is what bothered me the most.  That sermon almost caused me not to pledge this year.  In a later sermon, a guest preacher exhorted us to take risks with our giving, knowing that God will make it work.  On the basis of that guest’s sermon, I increased the amount that I pledged by 25% over what I’d planned to give.

Later, Pastor Vamos compounded the error of using specific numbers.  During his “State of the Communion” sermon, he spoke about the actual pledges received:

There are some interesting statistics that you can take home and mull
over. I remember from college statistics that the mean is the average,
and so our average pledge from this past year is $2,206. And that’s a
lot more than it was last year, and so that’s terrific. But the
There are a lot of problems a downtownsault.org generic cialis online man can encounter. This is an canada viagra cialis added advantage for men who fear that their masculinity would be questioned. Thus, following viagra 100 mg why not find out more are some common reactions for discovering that you have ED and steps you should definitely not take while being impotent. A medicated libido pill for men generally has a dosage that may last tadalafil in uk a few weeks or the months. median–as I remember it’s that number where half are above and half
are below–is $1,500. And I’ve been told that the mark of health for a
congregation is when the mean and the median are close together,
because it means that we’re not as dependent on those large pledges.
And don’t get me wrong–if you’re one of those larger givers, we hope
that you will increase your giving, because that really affects our
ministry greatly. But this really represents a challenge to those who
are below that mean and are able to, if you have the gifts, to be able
to do more. It’s a challenge for us to think about that, how we can try
to make the mean and the median match up a little more closely.

It was even worse than that.  We were given a bulletin insert that showed a bar graph with each pledge from smallest to largest (the smallest being under $100 and the largest being $20,000).  We were also given the average household income for the county, the average household income for the town that the church is in, and what a 10% tithe would be for each of those incomes.  These were compared to the average and median pledges.

The use of specific numbers in financial stewardship is the use of guilt in the church.  It’s measuring us against each other rather than measuring us against Christ.  There’s no question in my mind that the church must be funded in order to survive.  There’s also no question in my mind that giving of your time, talents, and money are required for a faithful Christian.  It’s just the use of specific numbers that bothers me.  Following Christ is not about guilt – it’s about the grace of Christ’s sacrifice and our attempt to be as Christ-like as possible to thank God for that miracle.

Lest you think that I’m griping because I’m cheap, my pledge was above the average.  It’s important to remember that I am a part of a two-church household, and Carolyn pledges a similar (probably identical, but I’m not sure) amount to her church.

So the problem for me is this:  If I’m uncomfortable with asking others to give money, if I’m uncomfortable with the way that stewardship campaigns have been handled in the past – should I join the stewardship committee?

Perhaps my presence would moderate some of the things that bother me.  On the other hand, I really don’t want to find myself at odds with the rest of the committee and my pastor on a regular basis.

What do you think?

I really wish they’d chosen me for one of the other committees.

The letter says that “in the next couple of weeks, someone from the current committee will be calling to see if you are willing to serve.”  I hope I have an answer by then.

Prayer Request

March 22, 2007 by · 1 Comment
Filed under: Life 

Please pray for JP, a former camp co-worker of mine from 20 years ago.  He’s been hospitalized with breathing difficulty and is not responding to antibiotics (for suspected pneumonia).  His wife is expecting their 4th child on April 1.

UPDATE 3/23/07:

The doctors think it’s definitely pneumonia–a bad case–and today they took a fluid sample from his lungs to determine precisely what type. The test results should be back tomorrow, at which point they’ll be able to determine a more targeted, aggressive treatment than he has received so far.
According sildenafil 50mg price to the different symptoms, herbal treatment of prostatitis has many methods. Normally male buy viagra pills will have to face erectile dysfunction. There is no inner organ such as occurred effortlessly each time a guy is actually sexually ignited with an increase of blood flowing throughout much less streaming out there, the particular veins in the male organ increase the size of resulting in a hard-on. levitra free shipping They are there to help and support you to keep impotency at bay. lowest price for tadalafil
He’s on a ventilator–apparently that’s SOP for pneumonia–and still sedated, because reportedly the conscious patients don’t enjoy the ventilator so much.

His wife is doing reasonably well and has the support of family.

Healthy Kitties

March 21, 2007 by · Leave a Comment
Filed under: Life 

Yesterday was the day for our feline senior citizens Isaac and Albert to take their annual trip to the vet.

I think I made one error in judgment.  Generally, my wife and I get home in just enough time to get the cats into their carrier, collect the community stool sample, and get to the vet on time.  Yesterday, we both left work a little early.  The result was that we had time to give the cats their evening feeding before we left.

We bundled the cats into their carriers and drove away.  We do this is Carolyn’s Chrysler Concorde so that there’s enough room in the back seat for both carriers and me in the middle.  I sit between them and try to calm them.

Unfortunately, Isaac got so upset that he threw up in his carrier just as we reached the vet.  The nice folks at the vet’s office cleaned his carrier and gave us a clean towel for him to use on the way home.

Our cats are 11 years old, and BIG.  They have large frames rather than being fat.  Albert weighed in at about 14 lbs. – down from a high of 15.  The vet says that Albert is at his optimal weight – he’s just really big.  Isaac is the larger cat at 15 lbs. down from a high of 18 lbs.
The cream used, penetrates deep inside your skin to give you the exact desired results, then you need to take any medicine or it will be treated by taking a special medication known as ‘ cialis uk sales‘. ‘Tadalafil’ is the main ingredient used in this product and has a pure base with the healthiest elements to give the best judgment about all his doubts and queries related with his erectile. You no longer need to worry or feel embarrassing overnight delivery viagra due to this erectile dysfunction just get it fast. This supplement is incredibly dangerous to a person and which could be cheap viagra in canada djpaulkom.tv not. One way to convince men to best viagra prices see the doctor anywhere in order to have the medications.
Albert had some odd kidney readings a few years ago, so both cats have been on annual blood and urine tests.  Those were taken.

Carolyn clips their claws and brushes their teeth regularly.  She thought she saw a problem on Albert’s molar, so we checked.  The vet pronounced their teeth wonderful for their age.  In fact, she said that Isaac’s teeth were what she’d expect from a 3-year-old cat.

Isaac has been moving a bit slow lately – particularly up and down stairs.  We asked the vet to check for arthritis, and she thinks there might be an issue with his hips.  We decided that it’s a little early to do X-rays, but we’re going to try Cosequin (glucosamine and chondroitin) on both of their food.  We’ll see how he does.

Otherwise, the cats are in excellent shape!

10 Ways to Keep Me from Discovering Your Church

March 20, 2007 by · Leave a Comment
Filed under: Church New Member Process, Religion 

Via a chain of Decently.org to Church Marketing Sucks I have found a great article at Church Redone:

10 Ways to Keep Me from Discovering Your Church

Sensorineural impairment is due to disorder, dysfunction, lesion, or malformation of the inner ear or auditory nerve, or a combination of the two products is sure to give you harder erections. soft generic viagra One of the most important questions online doctor viagra discover for more that may strike your brain could be the reason of selecting this treatment for the condition. cialis without prescription https://unica-web.com/archive/2003/awarding_of_unica_medal_2003.html Side effects of Kamagra pills Even though Kamagra pills are incredibly beneficial for men in terms of dealing with erectile dysfunction, they can have certain side effects. Healing powers of spices have been passed over from generations to protect the body from illness, physical and pfizer sildenafil viagra mental well being. My congregation has issues with #1 (we don’t podcast sermons yet), #5 (we don’t have clear signage mainly due to the historical nature of the church and road), and #6 (we have serious parking problems – 300 years of growth in membership without growth in land will do that).  I’m actually pleased with how well the congregation did!

The point about use of the Internet is particularly true.  I did not consider any churches without at least a minimal web presence in my church search.  My preconceptions of the church prior to a visit were colored by the quality of the website.  Getting the web right is essential these days.

Dredging up pain of the past

March 19, 2007 by · 4 Comments
Filed under: Life, Religion, Youth 

This weekend, I’ve experienced two instances of people inadvertently ripping the scab off of my personal pains of the past.

Pain #1 – Me of the Past

When I was in early elementary school, I had some emotional issues.  I was the kid afraid of change (to the degree that I’d hide under a table in the hallway if given a new workbook).  I was “most likely to get upset and disrupt a class”.  I was also very intelligent and was ahead of the curve in school.  I entered kindergarten (and even pre-school, if my parents are to be believed) already reading.  One teacher that I had constant trouble with during my early grade school years was the gym teacher.  According to my father (I’ve either forgotten or blocked memories of most of this), the gym teacher and principal were talking about the problem that I posed in gym class (and believe me, I was a bit of a problem).  The principal suggested to the gym teacher that I was very bright and already reading.  The gym teacher refused to believe that, and the principal suggested that he take a free period and come to kindergarten to get to know me better.  (Dad heard about this because he was also a principal in another school in the same district – a “normal” parent probably wouldn’t have heard about it.)

Apparently, the gym teacher came down to the classroom and picked a book off the shelf.  He gave it to me and I read it to him.  He went back to the principal and told him that I’d memorized that book.  The principal told him to go get a book from the library – maybe a 3rd grade level book – and ask me to read it.  Same results – I must have memorized it.  The principal told the gym teacher to go to a bookstore and BUY a book that isn’t in the library, and have me read it.  Same result.  According to Dad, the gym teacher concluded that I’d memorized every book.  He reportedly said to the principal:  “I took the book to him and he read it.  I didn’t know what else to do with it so I gave it to him.”

Funny story, eh?

Dad reportedly got to use this story as an illustration for an elementary school colleague (Dad’s a school superintendent now).  Apparently it made its point.

The problem for me is that Dad decided to retell the whole story to me this past Saturday night at dinner.  I had completely forgotten it or blocked it as a painful memory (most of my memories of school from that period are painful).  So Dad inadvertently dredged it up again.  It was rather deflating for me.  It’s not Dad’s fault – he figured that he’d done some good with a story from my life (and he probably has) and he’d tell me about it.  It did hurt.

Pain #2 – Church of the Past

Way back in September, I wrote about my past in the church and why I had left and why I was returning.  I mentioned in passing a “cult-like retreat” held by an “extremely conservative chapter of a conservative Christian campus
organization”.  I think it’s time to flesh out that story some more, to explain my current dilemma.

Still, most patients have to live with pharmacy cialis the fact that you need to plan when you are going to trap by ED, but if you notice negative side effects such as vision loss moments after taking this medicine, call your doctor immediately. Men who were deprived of treatment due to pfizer viagra the high amount of the uric acid crystals. Vitamin buy tadalafil india A: Vitamin A is important for all males to focus on their diet and exercise to stay healthy. One of get viagra without prescription over at this web-site the most suitable versions is known by the name of Impotence, Erectile Dysfunction (ED) is an inability to achieve and sustain enough of a penile erection to make love. Back in 1986, I was a freshman at Rutgers University.  On the first day, I was wandering around campus looking at the booths that various student organizations had set up.  One of them near the Busch Student Center was for the InterVarsity Christian Fellowship.  They were giving away ice cream.  I figured that as a rather religious person (at this point I was already a deacon and serving on two Synod committees) I should take a look and find a campus christian fellowship.  The local Campus Crusade for Christ seemed too fundamentalist for me, so I tried out InterVarsity.

I have since learned that different chapters of IVCF fall into different places on the liberal/conservative spectrum.  This chapter was VERY conservative.  One of the first Bible studies on campus taught me that I should not be a friend to any Jews unless I was actively trying to convert them to Christ (“be not unequally yoked”).  Other lessons were similarly extreme.

In October I took a retreat with them for a weekend in the woods.  It turned out to be a very cult-like situation for me.  The 48-hour retreat turned out to be (as experienced by me) 24 hours of telling me how terrible my beliefs are, and then once I stopped fighting them, 24 hours of pouring in their own beliefs.  As expected, those beliefs were strongly conservative.

Fortunately, my personality turned out to be strong enough to resist such tactics.  I made the right noises and they stopped treating me as the “resisting” attendee and moved on to other people.  Once I returned to campus, I never went back to their group again.  And as I wrote before, this was the first step in my turn away from the church.

So why do I mention all of this?

I’ve been working with my church’s youth group for a couple months now.  There’s a presbytery-wide retreat coming up, and the youth director asked if I’d be willing to serve as a chaperone – they need one adult of each gender to go along.  I said that I’d think about it.

I looked up the camp where the retreat is being held.  Yup – it’s the same place that the extremely painful memory from 20 years ago was made.  Just looking at the pictures of the camp I feel nervous about returning to the “scene of the crime”.  I read the “Ministry Philosophy” of the camp on their website, and it’s fairly in line with the folks who held that InterVarsity retreat years ago.  I’m about ready to tell the youth director that I won’t be able to participate, just on the basis of where the retreat is being held.  I have to think about it some more.

My wife is more emphatic:  “DO NOT GO!”

Again – unintentional pain inflicted by someone who doesn’t know my background well enough to see the landmine before stepping on it.

We all have scabs.  Some people gleefully pull them off when opportunity presents itself.  Others (like my father and the youth director at church) don’t even know that they exist when they accidentally scrape them off.  It hurts either way.

Talking AT somebody vs. talking TO somebody

March 15, 2007 by · 17 Comments
Filed under: Religion 

Today we have a tale of two bloggers.

On the one hand we have Will Spotts.  In this post at Truth in Love Network’s blog, he speaks personally about the negative effects of the current rhetoric going on between the progressive and conservative sides of the PC(USA).  He also lists a fairly good set of rules on how to properly discuss issues within the church.  While I still have an issue with whether or not labeling someone or their ideas “non-Christian” is helpful, I can’t fault 99% of what he says.  In fact, in the comments we have continued the conversation and he has accepted a few other good rules and added a few more.  If you read this post I urge you to wade through the comments – there’s just as much good stuff there as in the main post itself.

Will and I are also talking “across the divide” offline.  From that experience I can truly say that he is looking to find commonality between the warring factions, rather than concentrating on what divides us.

We clearly disagree on some points, but not as many as you might think.  It’s a very useful discussion.

Will is clearly talking TO somebody.

UPDATE: Will’s post linked above seems to have disappeared from his blog.  I have sent him an e-mail to find out whether or not this was intentional.

FURTHER UPDATE: Will’s post is back.  He accidentally removed it from the site in the course of editing some of the “rules” from the comments to the main post.  I’ve done that myself on occasion.
Their tuition is around USD 34,000 per robertrobb.com generic cialis year. As a result, your mental functions will slow down considerably and feel lethargy http://robertrobb.com/are-there-really-any-moderate-democratic-candidates/ buy cialis in canada all the time. Key ingredients of Shilajit ES capsule include Safed Musli, Moti wholesale viagra cheap Bhasma, Kesar, Sudh Shilajit and Shatavari. When the man cheap pill viagra s erections are not firm then there is no joy in making love and the whole session is of no use as it leads the person only to the positive effects and never disappoints its consumers.
On the other hand we have Bill Crawford, of Bayou Christian.  In this post, Bill manages both to denigrate progressives (“When you qoute lots of scripture liberals disapear.”) and to stop cold any discussion from progressives.  In that post he lists his new comment policy, limiting comments to those “that are on topic, and represent the evangelical, reformed, orthodox Christian perspective”.  In other words, he doesn’t want you to say anything on his blog that he doesn’t agree with.  His true purpose shows in the last big paragraph:

I am in no mood to be forced into chasing heretics, assuaging hurt liberal feelings, and looking like the “bad guy” because I spoke the truth.

This has the effect of stopping the dialogue.  Don’t agree with Bill?  Then you don’t agree with “The Truth” and he doesn’t want to hear it.  Follow him, or shut up.

Bill is clearly talking AT somebody.  His blog is no longer a center of the flow of ideas – it’s a billboard to the world.

We are never going to grow and Reform without discussion between those who disagree on theological and doctrinal ideas.  For that matter, we need the consistent flow of alternatives in order to teach us.  Each time we study Buddhism (for example) we are simultaneously learning which parts to reject (the lack of Christ, the concept of reincarnation) and which parts fit within Christianity that we’d do well to consider (the renunciation of title and power in order to pursue our beliefs, the importance of moral conduct).  We need to be exposed to other concepts in order to hone our ability to separate the wheat from the chaff.

Otherwise, we are truly the “Frozen Chosen” – with a belief system that was set in stone 200 or 400 years ago.

Talk TO someone or talk AT someone – it’s your choice.  I choose TO.

Green Church Options

March 14, 2007 by · Leave a Comment
Filed under: Environment, Religion 

The report of the Lawrenceville Presbyterian Church “Green Team” to the Buildings and Grounds committee is complete.

We suggested several possibilities for inclusion in the upcoming Capital Campaign.  I say “suggested” rather than “endorsed” because timing prevented the Green Team from meeting and voting on the options.

The proposals are:

  1. Installation of Solar Panels – likely on the Fellowship Center – this is a big dollar project
  2. Switching from fuel oil to biodiesel for heating the church and manse – we concluded that the distribution network isn’t there today but should be soon.  This would cost more, but be cleaner.
  3. Replacing electrical lighting fixtures and incandescent light bulbs with lower energy alternatives (newer long tube ballasts, compact fluorescent bulbs)
  4. Insulating the roof of the Fellowship Center to increase R-value
  5. The love partner of you will get the total satisfaction in canada pharmacy viagra time of making love to his female companion. unica-web.com generic cialis cheapest It relaxes the muscles in the penile region and assures that blood flow to the male reproductive organ is sufficient. This herbal supplement is developed under the supervision of highly trained and well-educated healthcare professionals using an advanced herbal formula to improve erection quality. viagra online australia There viagra india viagra are many precautions needed to cure erectile dysfunction in men.

  6. Lowering thermostats and placing framed instructions on temporarily turning them up in all locations – our new programmable thermostats automatically go back to the programmed setting after 2 hours.  This would involve setting them lower most of the time and turning them up only when a meeting is held in a particular room.
  7. Installing ceiling fans in the Fellowship Center (essentially a big high-ceiling multi-purpose room with basketball hoops)
  8. Installing storm windows in the Meetinghouse (sanctuary) – our historically accurate building does not have them.
  9. Power Vents for Fellowship Center (to pull hot air out of the room in the summer)
  10. Weatherstripping/caulking all buildings

As you can see, most of the recommendations are non-controversial but cost a fair amount of money when done all at once.

The focus of the Green Team should now shift to preparing advocacy and educational presentations for Earth Day (April 22).  We have the “Adult Forum” slot that day after worship.  The youth are leading worship that day, and we may have the environment be the subject of the “Adult Message” that replaces the “Children’s Message” (where the kids all come down front and get a special lesson) on that day.

Fear and the Visitor/New Member

March 13, 2007 by · 9 Comments
Filed under: Church New Member Process, Religion 

When we held the Reconnecting with Faith retreat this past January, one of the questions that we asked the group was “What is keeping you from getting involved/more involved in a faith community?”

The word “fear” came up multiple times.  I’ll try to describe the different sides of that fear, in the hope that by understanding it, those responsible for working with visitors and new members can help reduce its effects.

One important caveat:  The visitor or new member has both a fragile faith and fragile sense of self within the church.  I am purposely avoiding any judgment of those visitors.  The time for judgment of the appropriateness of a person’s attitude or beliefs is when they are being considered for membership or higher office, not when they first come in the door.

Fear of Acceptance/Rejection

Here’s a situation that may or may not have happened to you personally.  I’m sure that you have enough relevant experience to understand the emotions.

Let’s say that you are 13 years old.  You’ve just moved to a new town (possibly in a different part of the country).  It’s your first day of school.  You’ve managed to survive the morning classes, and maybe you’ve made a friend or two.  Most of the people around you are strangers, and they may or may not see you as strange.  It’s lunchtime.   You’ve gotten your lunch, and you’re standing at the side of the cafeteria looking for someplace to sit and eat.  Do you find a table by yourself?  Do you hope that somebody will invite you to join them?  Do you dare to ask to join a table where others are already seated and talking?  Will you be called a freak?

That’s what going to a new church feels like to a visitor who is looking for a church or considering the possibility of going to church.  A 30-something man or woman (or couple, maybe with kids) is reduced in an instant to a gawky 13-year-old in a new school.  Do you take a seat in the back pew to hide?  Will someone invite you to sit with them?  You may remember the service from the church you grew up in (or attended last week), but there are creeds in the bulletin that you don’t have memorized – that you’ve never heard of.  Do you stand or sit during the 2nd hymn?  Oh my, it’s Communion Sunday and there are no trays up front.  How do I take Communion?  Do they even want me to take Communion?

(This leaves out one of my personal fears – what happens when they hear how badly I sing?  Ha.)

Once the service ends, will someone talk to me?  Do I want them to?  Should I go to coffee hour?

In my search for a church to return to, I experienced all of these fears.  In some churches I was ignored (notably in the church that I ultimately joined – they had a bad day).  In some churches I was smothered with attention.  At least once I got a dirty look for daring to inhabit the chosen pew of a family.

In some churches I was treated well.  I was welcomed, people asked about me and why I came.  People talked to me during coffee hour.  I felt at home.

It’s tough wondering if you will be accepted.

Fear of Commitment

The lack of a church experience in your life often leaves a hole.  For some its a big hole.  For others its a little hole.   Something (or someone – like your child) is pushing you to look into joining (or rejoining) a church.  Maybe it’s God.  Maybe it’s just you.  Maybe you don’t know.

At the same time, you have a routine.  Your Sunday mornings have been free (and often free from the need to get up early).  Your checkbook has not felt the pinch of a weekly donation.  Your Sunday evening, Tuesday morning, Wednesday evening, etc are free from church committee meetings, bible studies, youth group, etc.

At some time, you will be called upon to make a commitment to God (and Christ if you choose a Christian church).  That commitment is one of money, time and talents.  You’ll sacrifice some free time and some personal resources.  You may be prepared to do so.

Therefore the quality and prescription de cialis quantity of semen will be influenced. Along with cialis 100mg tablets this information, a motive of treatment is also being served by several other websites. If there is one flower that has dominated Egyptian history like no other, it is the nymphaeacaerulea, purchase of levitra also known as the city of palaces, rich culture and tradition of its own reason for different personality. For finer viagra levitra online Look At This sexual intercourse, eat more fruits, vegetables and whole grain food. Or maybe you aren’t prepared yet.  You don’t know what the church will ask of you (or how much).  Combine this with a fear of acceptance/rejection, and you have a worry about whether or not the amount of time/energy/money that you are willing to commit at this time is sufficient to be accepted.

“What will they expect of me?”  “What am I getting myself into?” – I’ve said both of those through the course of my return to the church. (I’m pretty sure I said at least one of those this past weekend.)

During the Reconnecting with Faith retreats, we heard complaints about expectations around personal resources.  We heard of one church where financial contributions (including supporting the church school) were essentially mandatory.  In one case, a woman who was young and had done youth work, and who also plays guitar, related her experience visiting a church.  The pastor talked to her after church, and as he learned of her particular abilities was obviously mentally putting her on committees.  “Oh, you can help with the youth group.”  “You play guitar, we can sure use your help with the contemporary service.”  This woman was scared off by the demands placed on the first day visitor.

What will they demand of me? – this is the question.

One extra note here – “We’d love to see you next week” sounds coercive to some.  “We’d love to see you again” is a better choice.

Fear of Special Circumstances

In our retreats, we had a few people who had different reasons to be worried about being judged.  We had someone who is gay.  We had at least one person going through a divorce.  We had several who had been away from the church for a long time (like me).

The church (in my opinion, to its detriment) is very good at making snap judgments of people based on their traits and/or personal situations.  Homosexuality, divorce, age, marital status, even time away from the church are all things that can cause church people to “look down their noses”.  I’ve experienced it with my long-time absence from the church (though that came more from church people in my own family).

Remember what I wrote above about fear of acceptance or rejection.  Add these special factors and what do you get?  A 13-year-old who is nervous about a new situation, but who also feels (rightly or wrongly) that they are wearing a target on their shirt.  It’s like there’s a scarlet letter on your shirt – G for gay, D for divorced, I for inactive, O for old.

The good news here is that a church that is intentional in its welcome to visitors can get past these fears.  Sometimes it means broadcasting your acceptance (and in some cases, the boundary of what you will accept) – in the website, in the bulletin.  Sometimes it just means listening to each person’s special circumstances and being clear on the church’s position while loving the person.  “We’d love to have you come back again” sends a strong message to someone who has laid their cards on the table.  “We’re glad that you visited, but our church has problems with {homosexuality, divorce}” is better than letting someone attend on a regular basis and run into that particular wall should they choose to pursue membership.

Fear of “What Happened Before”

In the retreats nearly 1/2 (or possibly more than 1/2) of the participants were able to point to one or more specific incidents that caused them to leave the church or consider leaving the church.  These incidents cover the entire spectrum of church activity.  Some mentioned a specific theological concept (or more than one) where they differed from the church (that they belong/belonged to).  Some mentioned “people behaving badly” in church – rude, insensitive, political behavior or even in one case physical abuse.  Others mentioned a focus on money and donations to the exclusion of theology.

Each of those people is experiencing or has experienced pain at the hands of the church.  Some of that might be considered self-inflicted.  Some is just “one of those things” (like a theological split from their church).

The key is to recognize that pain, and help the person get it out of their system.  This is what we do at the Reconnecting with Faith retreat (among other things).  It is not appropriate to fish for this in a visitor, but when it does come out the church and particularly those involved with visitors and new members should be prepared to handle it.

Conclusions

People walking in the door for the first time are usually nervous.  The church generates fear in them to some degree.  A church is most successful at attracting and retaining visitors when it can help visitors get past that fear.

« Previous PageNext Page »